Staff Reports
A recent lawsuit filed by the Trump Organization against Capital One Bank might just be the chisel needed to crack open the dam of de-banking scandals that have arisen since January 6, 2021. As if the mainstream media didn’t make enough of a spectacle out of that day, labeling it an “insurrection,” now they might have to reckon with the consequences of their narrative. While President Trump was busy delivering a speech, chaos erupted, spurred on by some choice conspiratorial whispers. Ironically, while leftist agitators burned cities and tore down statues, the Trump Organization faced the wrath of the banking establishment.
Since that fateful day, a cloud of political correctness has hung over America’s financial institutions. The media played its trump card, launching a narrative that not only stifled conservative sentiments but also prompted banks and corporations to buckle under the pressure. Now, the Trump family is seeking restitution for the financial harm inflicted upon them, targeting Capital One for allegedly taking a political stance by unceremoniously closing down hundreds of accounts belonging to Trump’s companies.
This isn’t just a personal spat; it’s a full-blown battle over free speech and enterprise. According to the Trump Organization, this sudden banking boycott wasn’t just about business decisions—it was about the political climate. They argue that Capital One, swayed by their “woke beliefs,” abandoned longstanding clients because they were unfashionably associated with the former president. A staggering 300 business accounts were shut down without so much as a “by your leave.” The plaintive cry of the plaintiffs recounts how they were left in a lurch—stripped of their access to the only lifeline that keeps businesses afloat: their bank accounts.
The ambitious complaint lays the groundwork for a significant case, claiming that these actions were not merely unjustifiable but also illegal across several states. Trump’s representatives have alleged that the bank violated consumer protection laws and essentially engaged in motivated discrimination based on political alignment. Meanwhile, Eric Trump has highlighted that this is not just about his father’s financial dealings; it’s a grave threat to everyone who values free speech and conservatism in this country.
https://t.co/kGX7Ii8drN
The Trump Organization has filed a lawsuit against Capital One Bank for allegedly closing over 300 accounts without justification, claiming political discrimination following the January 6 Capitol breach. The lawsuit asserts that the bank's actions caused…— The America One News (@am1_news) March 12, 2025
But Capital One isn’t isolated in this discriminatory game; other banks, like Bank of America, are also getting heat for similar transgressions against conservatives. Reports emerged suggesting that Bank of America handed over sensitive customer data to the FBI regarding individuals present in D.C. on January 6—without a subpoena, no less. Those who dared to express their support for Trump found themselves in the crosshairs, bringing into question the sanctity of customer privacy when it clashes with political agendas. A shocking number of complaints amassed against BOA, illustrating that this is a widespread issue facing conservative Americans across the banking sphere.
The Trump Organization is now asking for the court to hold Capital One accountable for the damages inflicted not just on the business, but the employees and tenants that rely on it. In a world where “Know Your Customer” regulations were weaponized against those with conservative views, the lawsuit hopes to shine a spotlight on the hypocrisy of a banking system which has seemingly turned a blind eye to the shady dealings of the Hunter Biden clan despite multiple suspicious activity reports. If ever there was an opportunity for conservatives to push back against a political establishment that seeks to silence them, this might just be it. The outcome of this lawsuit could change the financial landscape for conservatives in America—and it is certainly a skirmish worth watching.
