Staff Reports
In a recent interview on CNN’s “Early Start,” CNN Legal Analyst Joey Jackson expressed his belief that “if it were not for the whistleblowers,” we would not be facing the charges against Hunter Biden. Jackson’s comments come in response to Hunter Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, who argued that his client would not be facing charges if his last name was not Biden.
Jackson suggests that the defense strategy is to portray the charges as politically motivated. He questions whether it is appropriate to file a multi-count indictment for unpaid taxes, suggesting that a civil proceeding may have been a better approach. He also mentions that Republicans have criticized the handling of the case, arguing that Hunter Biden received favorable treatment from the Special Counsel, Weiss.
https://twitter.com/Bella54263624/status/1733740520927838319
However, despite differing opinions on the case, Jackson emphasizes the importance of seeking justice. He highlights that in Delaware, the initial plan was for the matter to be resolved as a misdemeanor, a far less severe charge than a felony. With this in mind, he questions why the case has escalated to its current state and suggests that the defense strategy is to advocate for fairness and equal treatment under the law.
In conservative editorial opinion, this case is yet another example of the double standards and preferential treatment given to those with powerful connections. The fact that Hunter Biden’s last name is Biden should not shield him from facing the consequences of his actions. It is essential that justice is blind and that everyone, regardless of their family name or political affiliation, is treated fairly and equally. The prosecution’s intentions in pursuing these charges are being called into question, and it is crucial to ensure that political motivations do not overshadow the pursuit of truth and justice.
