Staff Reports
A federal judge, clearly taking her cues from the left, has decided to put the brakes on President Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), blocking their access to personal records from the Department of Education. Judge Deborah Boardman issued a temporary restraining order, and it seems she’s on a mission to protect sensitive data like it’s the last piece of cake at a party.
The judge’s ruling impacts not just DOGE but also the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), preventing it from sharing information as well. It looks like the court has decided to intervene in what appears to be a routine attempt to streamline government operations, claiming unauthorized disclosure of personal information amounts to “irreparable harm.” Newsflash: in an age where people’s information is shared left and right, this ruling feels more like a political stunt than genuine concern for privacy.
In her infinite wisdom, Boardman, a Biden appointee, hinted at the trauma inflicted by government transparency, with the lawsuit alleging that agencies were unlawfully granting access to personal data, including Social Security numbers and financial information. Apparently, any attempt by Trump’s administration to cut through the bureaucratic red tape is seen as a gross violation of civil liberties by the same folks who seem perfectly at ease with Big Tech harvesting personal data daily.
The judge emphasized that the plaintiffs were likely to suffer great harm without her intervention, which raises a few eyebrows when considering the very real threats facing average Americans today. Instead of empowering government agencies to function efficiently for the benefit of the public, the courts are throwing a wrench in the gears of progress, all while waving a flag labeled ‘privacy.’
Biden-Appointed Judge Blocks DOGE From Accessing Records From These Agencies https://t.co/X96PkOaSY7
— Michael J. Fell (@MichaelJFell) February 24, 2025
Moreover, it’s worth noting that DOGE has been credited with slashing costs across various federal agencies since Trump’s presidency began, including saving taxpayer dollars at agencies such as FEMA and USAID. Those trying to save the American taxpayer a buck are met with judges who act as gatekeepers to protect government inefficiencies. It begs the question: who’s really working for the people here?
The irony is thick enough to cut with a knife: a judge prioritizing the protection of sensitive data from government scrutiny but allowing the rest of the world to waltz away with it. Keeping government agencies cushy and inefficient seems to be the real goal, and who cares about irony when there’s a political agenda to maintain? Rest assured, this isn’t the last Americans will hear of this judicial roadblock, but one thing is crystal clear – efficiency and accountability are out, while bureaucratic red tape reigns supreme.
