As the election looms closer, the Democratic Party is pulling out all the stops to ensure Donald Trump doesn’t hurdle over the finish line in 2024. It appears that panic is setting in for the left, especially with Vice President Kamala Harris’s poll numbers sinking like a lead balloon. In a revealing twist, members of the National Association of Letter Carriers in Georgia have received a letter dripping with desperation and threats, framed under the guise of union advocacy. Who better to unleash fear tactics than union bosses with a clear agenda?
The letter, allegedly sent from the Georgia NALC President Don Griggs, warns letter carriers that if Trump is re-elected, it could signal an “existential threat” to their union and livelihoods. This sort of alarmism would make one think the former president was planning to disband unions with a flick of his wrist. The letter escalates into a vivid tale of doom, accusing Trump of having sinister plans for Project 2025—an initiative he publicly disavows and claims no involvement with. It seems the writers have jumped the shark, embracing a reality where unfounded concerns can rally the troops against a common “enemy.”
The People Handling Mail-In Ballots Call Trump an 'Existential Threat.' What Could Possibly Go Wrong? #RedState pic.twitter.com/4rwpDdj1Ja
— Ian Hansen 🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@IanHansensX) September 25, 2024
Scare tactics abound in this missive, claiming that Trump’s presidency would kick off a series of draconian labor reforms, such as dismantling public employee unions and permitting states to opt-out of basic wage protections. While these threats sound like something straight out of a dystopian novel, they have little basis in factual reality—much like the left’s grasp on the concept of fiscal responsibility. The tactics used to rally union members echo the vibes of a bad horror flick, where the specter of Trump looms large over the unsuspecting electorate.
Even more entertaining is Griggs’s response to this letter that carries his name without his endorsement. The NALC’s national leadership seems to play fast and loose with authority, promoting a narrative without the requisite consent. Griggs’s surprise at this political ploy highlights a significant disconnect within the union ranks. It’s almost as if the folks in charge believe they can simply brandish names without accountability, all in a desperate bid to generate solidarity against Trump.
Meanwhile, Georgia remains a hotbed of electoral tension, as Trump currently holds a narrow lead over Harris. The left knows that victory hinges on getting a handle on mail-in voting—a crucial component for Democrats who have mastered the art of ballot harvesting. However, major issues surrounding the mail system are driving state election officials to ring alarm bells, alluding to potential chaos as ballots either get lost in transit or show up late—an all-too-convenient scenario that could derail the voting process.
The incendiary language employed by Democrats paints a vivid picture of their frantic state of mind. After yet another near-miss on Trump’s life, escalating phrases about “existential threats” feel particularly reckless. Is this a calculated tactic to incite chaos, or just a series of unfortunate decisions on their part? The election season is heating up, and it’s clear that the Democrats are running scared, ready to throw caution to the wind as they desperately cling to any advantage they can muster.