Staff Reports
In the ongoing legal battle between former President Donald Trump and the New York Attorney General Letitia James (D), things are heating up. A recent twist in the case involves a New York City real estate attorney, Adam Leitman Bailey, who allegedly had unauthorized communications with Judge Arthur Engoron, the presiding judge in the civil fraud case against Trump.
Trump’s legal team has been given the green light to subpoena Bailey over this matter, as it raises concerns about potential ethical breaches. Bailey openly admitted to offering advice to Judge Engoron regarding the case, even though he claimed they never explicitly mentioned Trump’s name. Such interactions between a lawyer and a judge are generally frowned upon in legal circles, for obvious reasons.
Trump lawyers obtain big win in civil fraud case – Conservative Institutehttps://t.co/fDEcr5am2P https://t.co/fDEcr5am2P
— mar gan T (@marganT6) July 16, 2024
Judge Engoron, while acknowledging the merit behind Trump’s subpoena, has also expressed concerns about the scope of the requested information. He has cautioned against turning the subpoena into a “wholesale fishing expedition” by demanding all communications, including those unrelated to the case at hand, between Bailey and the court. However, he did concede that Bailey’s public statements have opened the door for scrutiny of any relevant communications or documents in Bailey’s possession.
This latest development underscores the contentious nature of the legal battle facing Trump. With allegations of fraudulent asset valuation and substantial penalties at stake, every detail and connection are being scrutinized. The fact that a real estate attorney felt compelled to offer unsolicited advice to the presiding judge raises eyebrows and adds another layer of complexity to an already convoluted case.
As the saga unfolds, Trump and his legal team are pushing forward with their efforts to challenge the proceedings and ensure a fair hearing. The outcome of this subpoena could shed light on the extent of behind-the-scenes interactions that may have influenced the case, leaving both supporters and critics eagerly awaiting the next chapter in this high-stakes legal showdown.
