Staff Reports
In a jaw-dropping turn of events, a George Washington University law professor, Jonathan Turley, gave a nod to former President Donald Trump, calling the Supreme Court’s decision a “real victory” in the case of his presidential immunity. Trump, known for his unapologetic stance on matters, applied for a stay after facing a roadblock when an appeals court dismissed his claims of immunity from prosecution. His legal team wasted no time in accusing special counsel Jack Smith of having a “political motive,” insinuating a move to influence the 2024 presidential election.
Turley, speaking with “Special Report” host Bret Baier, highlighted the significance of the timing in Trump’s favor. The clock is ticking for Smith, who has been eager to see a trial take place before the upcoming election. Turley pointed out that a delay in the court’s ruling could play into Trump’s hands, potentially pushing any trial proceedings past the election, much to the dismay of his opponents.
‘Running out of runway’: Jonathan Turley says Jack Smith is on the clock after Supreme Court takes Trump immunity case https://t.co/lOMqIS7iv7
— Bo Snerdley (@BoSnerdley) February 29, 2024
The Supreme Court’s decision to schedule oral arguments for the week of April 22 adds another twist to the already high-stakes drama. The same period coincides with the court’s discussions on a crucial charge the Justice Department has been wielding against individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. With Smith hot on Trump’s heels, securing a four-count indictment in August related to the former president’s post-election actions, the legal battle promises to intensify in the weeks to come.
Turley didn’t hold back in his analysis, pointing out that while the court didn’t grant a stay outright, the setting of arguments effectively achieves a similar result for Trump. The delay till April end serves as a strategic move for the former president, allowing ample time for legal strategies to unfold. The looming uncertainty of when a final decision may be reached adds a layer of suspense, leaving room for speculation on the court’s dissenting views on the matter.
The developments in this case paint a picture of a resilient Trump facing off against fierce opposition, navigating the legal landscape with finesse. In the battle for presidential immunity, the stakes are high, and the political undercurrents run deep. With the Supreme Court now in the mix, the showdown promises to be nothing short of enthralling, capturing the attention of conservatives rooting for Trump’s triumph in this legal saga.
