Staff Reports
In a recent defamation lawsuit, E. Jean Carroll has been awarded $83.3 million from former President Donald Trump for allegedly defaming her in 2019. However, what mainstream media fails to mention is the many questionable aspects of Carroll’s story. Despite the lack of evidence and credibility, she has been granted an exorbitant amount of money. This serves as a clear example of how the justice system has become corrupted, especially when it comes to targeting individuals like Trump.
Arm yourself with this info: https://t.co/ivuSFLLXCw
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) January 27, 2024
Carroll initially came forward with her story in 2019, claiming that Trump sexually assaulted her in a dressing room in the mid-1990s. However, there are numerous inconsistencies and red flags in her account. Firstly, there is no surveillance video of the alleged incident at Bergdorf Goodman. Additionally, there are no witnesses to support her claims. It is also worth noting that Carroll conveniently came forward with these allegations while promoting her book, “What Do We Need Men For?”, which featured a list of “The Most Hideous Men of My Life.”
Furthermore, Carroll’s story has constantly changed over time. She has struggled to remember when the alleged attack occurred, providing multiple different years and seasons. In fact, she even admitted to her lawyer that she has been constantly trying to pin down the date. Moreover, the dress she claims to have worn during the incident was not even available in the year she originally stated. These inconsistencies raise serious doubts about the credibility of her allegations.
Carroll’s behavior in the past also raises questions about her motives and sincerity. Despite regularly discussing sexuality and posting sexual content on social media, she never mentioned these alleged assault allegations until 2019. Additionally, she named her cat “Vagina” and made jokes associating sex with Bergdorf Goodman in a magazine article before the alleged attack took place. These inconsistencies and questionable actions make it difficult to take her claims seriously.
It is important to consider the potential ulterior motives behind Carroll’s defamation lawsuit. She is financially backed by anti-Trump Democrat megadonor Reid Hoffman, a supporter of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Furthermore, her attorney, Roberta Kaplan, is a Democrat Party activist with ties to Time’s Up, an organization that has faced controversy for its handling of sexual misconduct accusations. These political connections and motivations raise concerns about the true intentions behind Carroll’s lawsuit.
Overall, the awarding of millions of dollars to E. Jean Carroll raises serious doubts about the integrity of the justice system. With zero evidence and a multitude of inconsistencies in her story, it is clear that this judgment is more about politics than seeking justice. The mainstream media’s failure to acknowledge these discrepancies further highlights their bias and agenda. It is crucial to question the credibility of such allegations and to protect individuals from false accusations in our legal system.
