Staff Reports
There are times when what’s not being said is more important than what is. In one of those curious moments on the House floor, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been subpoenaed in a criminal case, according to a statement read by the House clerk. The statement indicated that Pelosi has received “third-party subpoenas from the prosecution and the defendant to produce documents” in a criminal case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. However, Pelosi did not disclose the specifics of the case. This leaves Fox News host Jesse Watters questioning what this case could be, as he speculates on various possibilities.
Watters wonders if the subpoena could be related to the trial of David DePape, who allegedly broke into Pelosi’s San Francisco home and attacked her husband, Paul Pelosi, with a hammer. He also considers the option of her husband’s DUI case as a potential reason for the subpoena. Additionally, Watters suggests other possibilities such as insider trading or the son’s shady business dealings. However, he acknowledges that there is no concrete evidence to support these theories, as Pelosi’s office has remained tight-lipped.
“Or is there something behind door No. 3? Maybe a little insider trading? The son’s shady business dealings? We don’t know,” the host continued. “We asked Pelosi’s office to explain. They said, ‘No comment.’ ~Jesse Watters
Let it be for insider trading🙏🏼 https://t.co/GZiKDoZ6cV
— ❥❥❥ᗰoᒪᒪie❥❥❥ (@mollie_don) November 3, 2023
The fact that Pelosi has been served a subpoena in a criminal case is noteworthy. It implies that there is information she is unwilling to voluntarily provide. Watters points out that innocent victims usually cooperate with investigators and willingly provide any necessary information. Therefore, Pelosi’s resistance to handing over documents raises questions about the attack on her husband and what relevant information she may possess.
While it may not imply that Pelosi orchestrated the attack or that it involved illicit activities, Watters suggests that the subpoena could be related to an entirely different case. However, instead of clarifying the situation, Pelosi’s silence allows wild rumors to circulate on social media. Regardless of the specifics, Pelosi’s refusal to comment speaks volumes.
