Staff Reports
The news has shown that the accusations against former President Donald Trump mishandling classified documents may have been politically motivated. Some documents have been revealed, suggesting that the case was orchestrated against Trump. Investigator Julie Kelly found connections between the National Archives lawyer and former President Barack Obama, raising questions about bias. It has been uncovered that the National Archive lawyer reached out to Attorney General Merrick Garland, alleging that Trump may have destroyed sensitive documents.
The investigation took a turn when it was revealed that the National Archives lawyer met with President Joe Biden’s counsel during the early stages of the probe. This has led to concerns about the fairness of the investigation. Additionally, it was found that the National Archives lawyer previously called January 6th, 2021, as “the worst day of my life,” showing potential bias against Trump.
As I have stated before, it appears that DOJ, NARA, and WH counsel first attempted to concoct a records destruction case against Trump.
New unsealed email from NARA lawyer includes a draft letter to AG Garland from archivist David Ferriero.
This is dated Sept 2021: pic.twitter.com/IE6f5gdSuQ
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) April 28, 2024
Former President Trump was facing serious felony charges, with the most severe carrying a sentence of up to 20 years in prison if convicted. The case has been put on hold as the U.S. Supreme Court reviews Trump’s claims of immunity. The possibility of granting Trump immunity could delay the case further, potentially pushing the outcome past the November election. This raises concerns about the timing of the legal proceedings and the potential impact on future elections.
The news has sparked debates about the fairness of the legal process and the motivations behind the accusations against Trump. Many are calling for transparency and accountability in the investigation to ensure justice is served. Questions remain about the integrity of the case and whether political bias has influenced the legal proceedings. It is crucial for the truth to come to light and for the justice system to uphold its principles, regardless of political affiliations.
